Thereafter, starting on page twenty-five of the magazine, there are five pages devoted exclusively to the plaintiff, four of which are completely photographic, while the fifth is made up of about half a page of rambling text and one photograph. 1," has on its cover a picture of a reasonably well-clothed Ann-Margret. A more apt description would be simply "tacky."ĭefendants' first edition of Celebrity Skin, pretentiously subtitled "Special Collector's Edition No. That description, however, by contemporary standards, *404 appears inappropriate. In view of such content, the plaintiff has attempted to characterize Celebrity Skin as hard core pornography. and Dorjam Publications, Inc., publish a magazine called High Society Celebrity Skin ("Celebrity Skin"), which specializes in printing photographs of well-known women caught in the most revealing situations and positions that the defendants are able to obtain. The defendants, High Society Magazine, Inc. This film, which was apparently highly successful, was widely distributed and was viewed by millions of persons, both in motion picture theatres and at home on various cable television broadcasts. She states that the decision to disrobe was an "artistic" one, made in light of the script necessities. In 1978 the plaintiff appeared in the motion picture "Magic," a film in which, for only the second time in her screen career, she appeared in one scene unclothed from the waist up. It would appear, from her reaction to her inclusion in the defendants' magazine, that she is also a woman of taste. The actress Ann-Margret is a woman of beauty, talent, and courage. Ladas & Parry, New York City, for defendants by Robert Alpert, Lawrence E. Sugarman, Dwight Yellen, New York City, of counsel. *402 *403 Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York City, for plaintiff by Robert G. and Dorjam Publications, Inc., Defendants.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |